AI 对话助手Chat assistants

• 缺统一实测，就不给分。跨工具的跑分口径不同——题目、预算、执行环境都不一样，A 的 90 分和 B 的 88 分不可比。No shared measurement, no score. Benchmarks across tools use different rules — different questions, budgets and environments. A 90 and a B 88 are not comparable.
• 「未知」是合法答案。查不到就写「未知」并说明为什么，不用推测填充。缺信息本身也是信息。"Unknown" is a legitimate answer. If it cannot be found, we write "unknown" and explain why, instead of filling the gap with guesses. Missing information is itself information.
• 来源链接、类型与核验日都在详情页里，可以逐条回去复核。The source link, its kind and the checked date are all on the detail page, so you can walk any of them back and re-check.
• lifecycle 单独标注。核验日新不等于数据有效——上游归档后数据会失效，所以单独标 active / maintenance / archived。lifecycle is marked separately. A recent check date does not mean the data is still valid — it goes stale when upstream archives the repo, so active / maintenance / archived are tracked separately.
• 不同族不混排。找现成的、自己搭的、接上与跑起来的是三种角色，坐标系不同；硬合成一张总表只会制造假的可比性。Families are not mixed. Ready-made tools, things you build yourself, and plug-in-and-run components are three different roles with different coordinate systems; forcing them into one master table would manufacture false comparability.

可信度标记怎么读How to read the confidence marks

详情页与上表都带Both the detail pages and the table above carry confidence，它反映, which reflects 本站数据的完整度how complete this site's data is，不是对产品的评价。, not a judgement of the product.

本站当前的完整度Current completeness on this site

数据层用Recheck this figure with node scripts/audit-gaps.mjs 可随时复核这个数字。. 下表实时计算（本页档案最后核验日 2026-11-03）：Computed from current data; profiles last checked 2026-11-03:

全站合计 1372/1896 维度已补齐Site-wide 1372/1896 dimensions filled（72%）

剩余未补齐项分三类：官方未公开（索引算法、沙箱实现细节本就不对外说明）、需实测才能确定（大仓库表现、CI 无 TTY 行为）、客观渠道不可达。The remaining gaps fall into three kinds: not disclosed by the vendor (indexing algorithms, sandbox internals are simply not documented), requires measurement (behaviour on very large repositories, CI without a TTY), and unreachable through objective channels.

我们选择留白而不是填「已支持」——错误的成本最终由使用者承担。We chose to leave a blank rather than fill in "supported" — the cost of an error is ultimately borne by whoever uses it.

数据来源与复核方式Sources and how to re-check them

全部数据来自开源仓库All data comes from the open-source repository speculcom/ai-handbook（CC BY 4.0）。 (CC BY 4.0).

每个条目都是纯 Markdown + frontmatter，含维度记录、证据链接、核验日与可信度标记。仓库内含：Every entry is plain Markdown plus frontmatter, carrying dimension records and an evidence chain with links, checked dates and confidence marks. The repository contains:

• tools/METHODOLOGY.md —— 方法论总纲与核心规则the methodology charter and core rules
• tools/axes/ —— 每个维度的定义与判定标准（含正反例）the definition and decision criteria for each dimension (with positive and negative examples)
• tools/SCHEMA.md —— 数据格式规范与构建校验规则the data-format spec and build validation rules
• tools/protocols/<大类><category>/_protocol.md —— 实测协议(the measurement protocol (尚未执行not yet run，故本站暂无实测结论), so this site has no measured conclusions)

发现错误或有新证据，欢迎提 Issue 或 PR——每条修正都会注明依据与影响范围。Found an error or have new evidence? Open an issue or a PR — each correction notes its basis and blast radius.